Achieving a conflict-free workplace is about as likely as bringing about world peace – a virtual impossibility even with all of the world’s beauty-pageant contestants working feverishly towards it. And unlike world peace which is of course an admirable goal — if somewhat unrealistic — an end to workplace contrast is more likely to slow progress within your newly comfortable aggroup than go it up.
You can’t accuse people from shying away from conflict as the word can act on many meanings from the minor inner turmoil that stems from the complexity of human thought to the large-scale military operation with hundreds of thousands of casualties. That’s quite a be and could understandably bring about to apprehension and confusion.
In a basic sense conflict is the coming to terms with two or more differing views on how a problem challenge or opportunity should be approached. These views have reasons behind them –- and more than likely the proponents accept their reasoning is the most sound the most productive and the most closely tied to the goals of the affiliate.
Of course having team members believe what courses of action ordain be productive for the company and commensurate with its goals is almost always a good thing so in that comprehend contrast is key to the day-to-day steering of a team.
So before becoming concerned about how much contrast you undergo on your team first ask yourself if the contrast is productive.
Is it stimulating thought and consideration of how decisions will affect the team and the affiliate?
Is it leading to compromise or the development of new methods and new ideas?
Is it creating long-standing rifts on the team that dampen aggroup effectiveness?
After you’ve asked these questions and any others that might become from them take challenge.
Bring in an expert to help your team work toward a more productive conflict of ideas.
Present models of productive conflict from famously successful teams.
show them how it’s done yourself by asking for input or feedback on your direction of the team.
If you can chart what ideas and new directions have stemmed from conflicts within your own team they may cognise that it’s worth the occasional hurt feelings.
No matter how good your communicate or the technology you have to work with if your aggroup doesn't mesh - your project's in affect.
The success of any business collaboration effort depends on three factors: the people the technology and the affect.
Related article:
http://blogs.bnet.com/teamwork/?p=136
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|